ShareThis Page
News

Pittsburgh's riverfronts will continue to attract investment

| Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 12:00 p.m.

About $4 billion has been invested in Pittsburgh's riverfronts since 1999, and at least as much will be spent in the next decade, an environmentalist predicted yesterday.

"We don't see it slowing," said Lisa Schroeder, executive director of Riverlife. "There is still a great amount of developable property in the city."

Schroeder spoke after a seminar, "Philanthropy's Role in Revitalizing Pittsburgh," that was part of the national conference of Grantmakers for Effective Organizations in the Hilton, Downtown. About 500 philanthropists, representing $150 billion in assets, attended.

Schroeder served on a panel with Caren Glotfelty, director of the environment program for The Heinz Endowments, and Brian J. Hill, a program officer with the Richard King Mellon Foundation.

They detailed the history of Pittsburgh's "renaissances" that improved the quality of the city's air and water, revitalized the Downtown and developed its riverfronts.

Between the 1920s and 1940s, the city averaged 165 tons of soot per square mile in a month, Hill said. Some areas averaged 600 tons per square mile in a month.

He said city leaders, Jack Heinz and Richard King Mellon recognized the city had to clean up its air, to prevent people and businesses from leaving and to attract growth.

The foundations later worked together to create Pittsburgh's Cultural District.

"In the 1970s and '80s, Pittsburgh was relatively seedy," Hill said.

He said the city and foundation officials used a top-down approach that did not always work. He cited malls developed in the North Side and East Liberty, and the uprooting of residents in the Hill District to build Mellon Arena.

In contrast, the city and foundations encouraged public participation when gathering ideas for riverfront development. The eventual construction of PNC Park and Heinz Field pushed the boundaries of Downtown across the river.

Schroeder said $113 million was spent on riverfront infrastructure and $90 million on roadways around the rivers. Glotfelty estimated that local foundations gave a total of $50 million to develop the riverfronts.

As a result, more people are using the rivers. Schroeder said there were 15,000 kayak rentals on the Allegheny River last year, compared to 2,500 a few years ago.

The next phase includes development of 13 miles of riverfront, called Three Rivers Park, from the West End Bridge to the 31st Street Bridge and to the Hot Metal Bridge. That is expected to be completed by 2020.

A remaining issue, though, is the release of sewer overflow into the rivers by 83 municipalities, Glotfelty said. That is expected to cost between $5 billion and $10 billion to fix.

One of the convention goers congratulated Pittsburgh on its improvements.

"I never realized the amount of effort that went into the reclamation of these lands," said Les Phillips, board chairman of the Alberta Real Estate Foundation in Calgary, Canada.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me