ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh's Building Inspection Chief Matveiev resigns

| Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009, 12:00 p.m.

The head of the city's embattled Bureau of Building Inspection on Tuesday announced his resignation after a little more than a year on the job.

Sergei Matveiev, 42, submitted his resignation earlier this month. It is effective Nov. 20.

He leaves to become a code inspector at Robinson-based Plans Examiners Inc. He later will become manager of the company's newly formed architecture firm, he said.

In June, Matveiev came under fire from the state-appointed Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority and Mayor Luke Ravenstahl. The authority gave the bureau 30 days to craft a plan to improve its building inspection rate, code enforcement efforts and customer service, which the bureau still has failed to do. The mayor chastised the bureau at the time, saying it was too focused on issuing permits instead of enforcing building codes on blighted properties that plague city neighborhoods.

Matveiev said the disputes weren't a factor in his resignation. "There have certainly been things difficult to deal with on a daily basis, but it was a great opportunity.

"The biggest honor and privilege of my career has been serving as chief (of the bureau)," Matveiev said.

Matveiev's predecessor, Dan Cipriani, resigned as acting head of the bureau in October 2008. Matveiev replaced him that same month. Matveiev had worked as a city building plan examiner since June 2004 and in the private sector before that.

Matveiev is the third Bureau of Building Inspection chief to either resign or be fired during Ravenstahl's three years in office. Ravenstahl fired Ron Graziano in September 2007 after 23 years with the city.

Public Safety Director Michael Huss will be responsible for finding Matveiev's replacement.

"I expect to do another national search. Let's try to get the best person for the job," he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me