ShareThis Page

Clairton teen charged in death of elderly neighbor

| Thursday, Oct. 15, 2009, 12:00 p.m.

A Clairton teenager charged in the fatal beating and stabbing of an elderly neighbor should be sent to juvenile court for treatment, a defense psychiatrist told an Allegheny County judge on Wednesday.

Common Pleas Judge Kevin G. Sasinoski is expected to conclude hearings this morning on whether Johnie Washington, 17, should be prosecuted as an adult or a juvenile for the Oct. 6, 2007, slaying of Florence Ranta, 82, inside her home. Washington lived less than 100 yards away.

"Homicide is a crime that's very unlikely to be repeated again," testified Dr. Robert Wettstein, noting that Washington had mental-health problems and used drugs and alcohol.

Assistant District Attorney Steven Stadtmiller, though, contends that Washington should be tried as an adult.

"Clearly he has a history of violent behavior. My opinion is that he's not amenable to treatment within the time frame of the juvenile-court system," testified Dr. Bruce Wright, a prosecution witness.

Washington could remain incarcerated only until his 21st birthday if the case would be sent to juvenile court.

Sasinoski is expected to rule within two weeks.

Stadtmiller said investigators found Washington's thumbprint on Ranta's phone and that her phone cord had been cut. Police found a brick and a knife with Ranta's blood on it in weeds about four houses away. Investigators also found Ranta's blood on shoes in Washington's home.

Investigators also found Washington's fingerprints inside Ranta's car, which police said he stole after killing her, Stadtmiller said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me