ShareThis Page

Champion bodybuilder from Pittsburgh admits role in drug ring

Jason Cato
| Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 12:00 p.m.

A bodybuilder once crowned Mr. Pittsburgh for his weightlifting prowess pleaded guilty in federal court Monday to his part in a prescription-drug ring.

Nick Morobitto, 31, formerly of Baldwin, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to illegally sell oxycodone, a potentially addictive painkiller with effects similar to morphine and heroin. U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry scheduled sentencing for Sept. 25.

Morobitto's plea deal was filed under seal. Neither he nor his attorney, Martin Dietz, spoke after the hearing.

Also charged as part of the case is Morobitto's high school friend, Matthew Warhola, 32, of Mt. Lebanon, and Justin Swoger, 31, of Smithton. Swoger pleaded guilty in September. Warhola is scheduled to plead guilty July 1.

The group sold OxyContin tablets from August 2006 to April 2007, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory Nescott. U.S. Postal Inspectors in Pittsburgh became suspicious of a number of packages being mailed to "Liberty Wresting" at a UPS store in Bethel Park from an address in Las Vegas, where Morobitto now lives.

Federal agents tracked about 30 packages sent from Nevada to Pittsburgh, and 17 from Pittsburgh to Las Vegas. The inbound packages were believed to contain prescription drugs, with the outbound packages containing money, Nescott said.

Agents opened one of the incoming packages in April 2007 and discovered 114 OxyContin pills with a street value of about $7,000, Nescott said. OxyContin tablets sold on the street for about $1 per milligram at the time, Nescott said.

Morobitto won the 2002 Mr. Pittsburgh bodybuilding competition in the heavyweight and overall champion closed categories. That year he was named Upper Ohio Valley heavyweight and overall champion. In 2004, he placed 14th in the heavyweight division at Junior Nationals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me