ShareThis Page

Allentown building might house police station

| Friday, Nov. 7, 2008, 12:00 p.m.

Pittsburgh City Council on Thursday tentatively approved renovating an Allentown building that would become a new police station.

The building on Warrington Avenue is owned by the Urban Redevelopment Authority and once served as a youth hostel. If council approves the renovation plan in a final vote Tuesday, the city will own the building.

The $1.8 million cost of the renovation isn't part of the legislation, meaning the price tag could rise, said Councilman Bruce Kraus.

The new Zone 3 station would replace a South Side precinct in disrepair. A state Department of Labor and Industry investigation found it had cockroaches, leaky pipes and unacceptable levels of lead residue in the basement, which once housed a firing range.

Mike Gable, deputy director of Public Works, said those problems are being fixed so the station can be used until the new one is ready. Officers could move by April, police bureau manager John Warren told council.

"This is going to be the best police station in the city," Warren said. "We will actually be able to interact with the community in that facility."

Warren said the new station will have one of three Nautilus-equipped exercise facilities in the city. A public conference room will be equipped with a flat-screen television.

City Council also gave its final approval to legislation introduced by Kraus that would raise fines on open-container violations. Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, who is on paternity leave for another week or so, could still veto it.

First-time offenders would face a fine of $200, up from $50. A second offense would cost up to $300, up from $100. Additional violations could carry a maximum fine of $500.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me