ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Kate Ford Elliott

Jason Cato
| Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2007, 12:00 p.m.

Age: 58

Residence: Highland Park

Family: Husband, Frederick; one son.

Occupation: President judge of the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

Education: Bachelor's degree in education, University of Pittsburgh; master's degree in education and law degree, both from Duquesne University.

Background: Taught students with reading disabilities in the Pittsburgh Public Schools before becoming a lawyer; served as the Superior Court's chief staff counsel before being elected to the bench in 1989; became president judge in January 2006; past chairwoman of the Allegheny County Appellate Practice Committee; member of the American Bar Association's Judicial Administration Division and an ABA fellow; vice chairwoman of the Pennsylvania Futures Commission in the 21st Century; member of the National Association of Women Judges and the American Judicature Society; former member of Duquesne's board of directors.

Noteworthy: Recipient of the 2007 St. Thomas More Award, to be presented Oct. 23 at the St. Thomas More Society dinner following the 49th annual Red Mass of the Diocese of Pittsburgh. The society is a group of Catholic attorneys, judges and government officials.

Quote: "It was said of St. Thomas More that he was the king's good servant, but God's first. The same can be said of Judge Kate Ford Elliott," said Daniel Trocchio, a member of the St. Thomas More Society and attorney with K&L Gates, Downtown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me