ShareThis Page

Woman gets probation for blast in school

| Thursday, Oct. 27, 2005, 12:00 p.m.

A former laundry matron at Perry Traditional Academy accused of blowing up a school laundry room by lighting a large firecracker was sentenced Wednesday to five years' probation after pleading guilty to several misdemeanor charges.

Bernadette Wilson, who lost three fingers in the May 2004 blast, also was ordered to pay Pittsburgh Public Schools $12,000 for damage to the North Side school.

Wilson, who denied lighting the firecracker -- described by investigators as an "M-200" -- pleaded guilty to criminal mischief, possessing an illegal firework, reckless endangerment and drug possession. The District Attorney's Office dropped arson and felony drug charges in exchange for her plea.

Police said Wilson, 56, of the North Side, lit the firecracker at her desk in the pool-side laundry room on May 19, 2004. No one else was injured. Wilson was fired.

"The payment of restitution and those things that happened to you will satisfy the court," said Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge John A. Zottola.

Police investigating the blast found bags and bottles of cocaine and marijuana in Wilson's purse and desk. Investigators would not say if they believe Wilson was on drugs at the time.

When Zottola asked Wilson why she brought the firecracker to the school, she replied, "I don't know where it came from."

After yesterday's hearing, Wilson said she did not light the firecracker and was not on drugs.

"It was just a freak accident," she said, tears still running down her cheeks from the hearing. "Now I have to live with this for the rest of my life."

Wilson said she still is not working. When asked how she would come up with the money to repay the school district, she replied, "By God's will."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me