ShareThis Page

Project for convicts wins 'Oscar'

| Wednesday, July 27, 2005, 12:00 p.m.

An Allegheny County program that helps mentally ill state prisoners reintegrate into society has won a prestigious Innovations in American Government Award from Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

The award, often called the Oscar Award of government service, is to be given to the Allegheny County State Forensic Program in a ceremony today in Washington, D.C.

The honor comes with a $100,000 grant to expand the program and to teach other groups around the nation about how to start similar ones.

"The program demonstrates that you can help people with mental illness whom many people would write off," said Marc Cherna, director of the county's Department of Human Services.

There were more than 1,000 applicants for the award, and the Allegheny County program was one of five winners.

Started in 1999, the forensic program pairs Allegheny County natives serving time in state prisons with counselors as the inmates approach the completion of their maximum sentences.

Then, as they return to Allegheny County, counselors continue to help the former inmates find housing, counseling, services and jobs in an effort to prevent them from committing new crimes.

"People want assistance, especially if it is done in the right way with respect," Cherna said.

The more than 300 inmates treated in the program have had a recidivism rate of about 10 percent, Cherna said, far below the national average of 61 percent for individuals released from state prisons who have mental health problems.

"When compared to the national average, it's easy to see how this program is changing lives, changing attitudes and saving tax dollars," said Stephen Goldsmith, director of the awards.

Cherna said it costs about $3,000 to help each client in the program annually, compared to imprisonment costs of more than $20,000 a year for each inmate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me