ShareThis Page

Council OKs tax cut for 'visitability'

Tony LaRussa
| Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2004, 12:00 p.m.

Property owners in Pittsburgh who include features in buildings that ease navigation for people with disabilities will be eligible for tax breaks if the state Legislature signs off on a measure approved unanimously Tuesday by City Council.

Councilman Sala Udin introduced an amendment to the ordinance that delays its implementation for 90 days or until after it is approved by state lawmakers.

The changes to the design of buildings are part of a growing trend called "visitability," making buildings easier to visit for people with disabilities.

To make a property visitable, it must have:

  • Lower light switches, door handles instead of knobs, and wider doors and hallways to accommodate people in wheelchairs.

  • At least one entrance without steps.

  • At least one bathroom on the accessible floor that is big enough to accommodate a wheelchair.

    The ordinance gives a tax credit of up to $2,500 over five years on the additional tax revenue generated when a property's value increases as a result of renovation or the construction of a building on vacant land.

    Advocates for the physically disabled say such changes also can help older people remain in their homes longer and improve the quality of life for the disabled by allowing them to visit relatives and friends who have "visitable" homes.

    Advocates for the physically disabled hailed council's action, despite the waiting period.

    "We realize that these kinds of changes won't happen overnight," said Lucy Spruill, 60, of Squirrel Hill. "Because of Pittsburgh's terrain and older housing stock, we may not have 100 percent visitability. But this is a great start."

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me