ShareThis Page

Newspapers want Heinz records opened

| Thursday, Aug. 26, 2004

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is joining the attempt to make public the estate records of the late Sen. H. John Heinz III.

The Tribune-Review will move to intervene in a legal proceeding to unseal the documents, attorneys for the newspaper's law firm, Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, said Friday.

The Tribune-Review is a sister paper of The Herald.

The Morning Call of Allentown and the Los Angeles Times last month petitioned Allegheny County Common Pleas Court to open the records, filed and sealed after Heinz died in an April 1991 plane crash. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also has sought to intervene in the legal action.

In the initial petition, the Morning Call and the Times argue releasing the records will provide insight into whether the philanthropic activities of Heinz's widow, Teresa Heinz Kerry, are related to the campaign activities of her current husband, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts.

The newspapers argue that probate records typically are open for public inspection in Pennsylvania, and that there is nothing to indicate why the seal should remain in place.

Without any apparent hearing, the records were sealed by Common Pleas Judge Nathan Schwartz the day after the popular Fox Chapel Republican senator died.

The newspapers are not seeking sensitive financial information such as Social Security numbers. If such information is contained in the records, it could be withheld by the court, the petition states.

New York attorney Paul Bschorr, who represents the Heinz estate, has vowed to vigorously contest the petition. A hearing before Common Pleas Judge Frank Lucchino is scheduled Sept. 14.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me