ShareThis Page

Officials propose way to counter reassessment woes

| Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2001, 12:00 p.m.

Pittsburgh officials asked a judge Tuesday to set temporary land values for residential properties, charging that the reassessments done by Sabre Systems & Services Inc. have wreaked havoc on the city's tax structure.

Attorneys asked that land values be set at 15 percent of overall property values. Currently, land values represent about 21 percent of the city's overall property value of $13.3 billion.

Common Pleas Judge R. Stanton Wettick Jr. set a deadline of noon Monday for Ohio-based Sabre Systems to explain in writing its methods for setting land values.

The city taxes land at six times the rate at which it taxes buildings, leading to fears of huge increases in tax bills as a result of the first countywide reassessment in 20 years.

Wettick asked why the city waited until now to register its complaint. Ronald Pferdehirt, assistant city solicitor, responded that Sabre Systems only turned over a breakdown of land values this month. Until then, only one figure showing land and building values combined was available.

Pferdehirt said the city wants the 15 percent value for one year only, to allow Allegheny County time to make appropriate changes for the 2002 tax year.

Wettick appeared closer to a decision involving a class action lawsuit that claims the county, Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Public Schools tax rates for 2001 will exceed a 5 percent cap on property tax income in the year following the reassessment. Wettick accepted final oral and written comments and scheduled a meeting in his chambers at 9 a.m. today.

Anthony Todd Carlisle can be reached at or (412) 765-2312.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me