ShareThis Page
Opinion

Laurels & Lances

| Saturday, Jan. 27, 2007

A Fond Farewell: To Sacred Heart Chapel in Dawson. The doors closed after 119 years with a final Mass last week. Officials with the Diocese of Greensburg said a limited number of priests are available to cover the churches in the Connellsville area. Masses at Immaculate Conception, St. Rita's, Holy Trinity and St. John the Evangelist were reduced in addition to the Sacred Heart closing.

On the "Watch List": Connellsville Area School District. The district is running a bulk-buying program in the style of big box retailers, saving money on supply costs but pouring resources into a warehouse operation. Director Ed Zadylak, who is calling for an end to the program, deserves consideration from his fellow board members. Run the numbers. Let's see if an order-as-needed supply chain makes more cents .

Laurel: To Connellsville's mayor and city council. The financial conundrum this panel inherited is nobody's fault. It's a simple problem: The cost to run the city is more expensive than citizens are able to afford. But the solution is complicated because residents expect (and deserve) a safe and sanitary lifestyle. Council has finally sought help in the form of a major shake-up by state-funded consultants. It's just what Connellsville needs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me