ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Politics

| Saturday, Sept. 25, 2004

Dear Editor:

With lies and misinformation circulating during this election cycle, I feel it is the duty of every American to learn all they can about the candidates and the issues. We cannot rely on biased news outlets, such as ratings hungry talk radio and television shows to formulate our opinions. Voters must sift through the partisan politics and learn the facts.

We must not be fooled by candidates that use catchy buzz words. "Compassionate Conservatism" is one example being thrown about this election season. What this phrase really means is show the American people compassion during the four-day political convention and the rest of the four-year term in office put big business before America's families.

Having received my bachelor of science degree in political science, I find it very informative, when researching a presidential candidate, to review how the citizens of the candidate's home state view the candidate. Being a resident of Massachusetts, I strongly believe the citizens of our great county will be well served by a John Kerry presidency.

In Massachusetts, Sen. Kerry is always working to improve the quality of life for all residents. I believe on Election Day you will see overwhelming support from our state for John Kerry.

John Kerry has the experience, knowledge, integrity and compassion that makes him a tremendous candidate for President of the United States of America.

Joseph J. Carrara Jr.,

Pocasset, Mass.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me