ShareThis Page

Ex-supervisor repays funds, gets probation

| Wednesday, July 5, 2006

A former Connellsville Township supervisor who admitted stealing nearly $63,000 in public funds was sentenced Monday to five years of probation after making full restitution.

Tammy M. Mader, 43, of Buttermore Boulevard, pleaded guilty in May to third-degree felony charges of theft by deception and theft by receiving stolen property.

Fayette County Judge Ralph Warman said that he does not like to order probation in cases involving substantial thefts, but he decided to abide by the negotiated plea agreement because township officials supported it.

Township solicitor Richard Bower confirmed Mader had repaid $62,933. If she had failed to pay back the full amount, prosecutors would have recommended a prison sentence of six to 24 months.

Defense attorney James Davis said the thefts happened while Mader was going through a difficult period after the death of her husband, George.

"Ms. Mader has expressed her regrets over this entire incident," Davis said.

Mader worked as a township secretary and treasurer for more than a decade before her election as one of the three township supervisors in 2002.

Township officials fired her in late 2003 after an audit revealed Mader was writing checks to herself and her deceased husband in 2002 and 2003. Only her signature was on the township checks, which are supposed to be signed by at least two supervisors.

Mader used the township funds for several personal expenses, including credit card payments and home utilities, according to state police at Uniontown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me