ShareThis Page
News

Slow day at the polls

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2007

The weather was cold and the snowflakes started blowing yesterday. Many believe the wintery weather affected the turnout in Tuesday's General Election.

In many areas of the Fay-West, voter turnout was low.

In Dunbar, Ruth Eans, a judge of elections stationed at the Dunbar Volunteer Fire Department, wasn't really surprised by the low number of voters who had visited to cast their votes.

"We were expecting a lot of that because of the weather," Eans said.

The National Weather Service out of Pittsburgh reported yesterday's low temperatures in the 30s with snow flurries and wind gusts as high as 25 miles per hour.

Eans said with no big races, voters normally don't come out.

"And a lot of the older people don't like the (voting) machines," said Eans.

Charles Anderson, a judge of elections at Ward One at the Uniontown VFW, said he observed turnout lower than what was expected. However, the crowd flow was consistent throughout the day.

"I wasn't expecting anything," Anderson said.

But over in neighboring Scottdale, Westmoreland County, voter turnout was better than one judge of election anticipated.

"We've had a good turnout," said Bruce Stiehm, a judge of elections at the Scottdale Church of Christ. "It's been better than usual."

While Stiehm said that bad weather is sometimes an issue with voter turnout, the fact that there was a race in one Scottdale Ward and residents were voting for school board candidates helped.

"It's a real pleasure to see people coming out," Stiehm said.

Stiehm said normally there's a bigger push near the end of the day with voters arriving after work to beat the 8 p.m. deadline.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me