ShareThis Page

Drilling impact fee up for consideration in Fayette

| Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Fayette County commissioners next week will consider adopting an ordinance imposing impact fees on Marcellus shale wells.

Commisssioners Angela Zimmerlink and Vincent Zapotosky on Tuesday voted to place the proposed ordinance on the agenda for the board's possible approval at its regular meeting on March 20. Commissioner Al Ambrosini did not attend yesterday's meeting.

Zapotosky and Zimmerlink did not have an estimate on the amount of revenue the fees might generate, but a Tribune-Review analysis put the figure for 2011 at $6.9 million.

Of the $6.9 million, the county would receive an estimated $1.5 million. Fayette's municipalities would split $2.7 million, with the remainder to go to the state.

How the money will be spent has yet to be determined, but state legislation calls for some of it to go toward road and bridge repairs as well as parks and recreation projects. The amount that will go to each municipality will be based on a formula that uses the number of wells in each community or the proximity to towns with producing Marcellus shale wells.

Zimmerlink said the Fayette County Marcellus Shale Task Force will hold a public meeting 6 tonight at Swimmer Hall at Penn State, The Eberly Campus in North Union. She said residents who want more information on the state legislation that authorized the fees, as well as on how the revenues can be spent, should attend the meeting.

Neighboring counties, including Westmoreland and Washington, have adopted ordinances. Early estimates indicate the fees will generate $2 million for Westmoreland County and another $2 million that will be split among its municipalities.

In other business, commissioners next week will consider hiring a chief clerk and a public works director. The two positions are to be filled because county Manager Warren Hughes has retired.

Commissioners meet 10 a.m. Tuesday at the Public Service Building in Uniontown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me