ShareThis Page

Pirl's predicament: Upper Tyrone resident seeks sewage relief

| Thursday, April 7, 2005

James Pirl, of Upper Tyrone Township, is probably one of the few individuals in the area still using an outhouse -- and it's not his choice.

Public sewage has not yet been offered to residents along Broadford Road, where his house is located, and township supervisors are not in favor of him installing a septic system since the property is located below flood level.

Pirl inherited the house and the outhouse when his father passed away.

Because Pirl has been having some health problems, his cousin, Mark Pletcher, has been attending township meetings since 1999 to see what can be done about Pirl's predicament.

Pletcher said he was told by township supervisors in 1999 that they hoped to bring public sewage to that area of the township in two years. Today they are still at least two years away from doing that.

Supervisors have discussed Pirl's plight with Pletcher, suggesting a sand mound. Pletcher said a sand mound would cost about $12,000, an unnecessary expense if public sewage will be available to Pirl soon.

Township Supervisor Sam Killinger said Pirl also has the option of a holding tank that could be placed below ground since it's a sealed unit.

"He would have to get it pumped every so often," Killinger said.

The supervisors also suggested a biodegradable toilet.

"It runs on electric and a lot of people get them for their cabins," Killinger said. "It leaves no waste."

Pletcher said he does not remember those two suggestions being mentioned.

"We're trying to work with him as much as we can," Killinger said.

He added supervisors have been trying to obtain public sewage for the 300 homes in the township that need it.

"We've got the land study done and now we're waiting for DEP (Department of Environmental Protection) to give us their recommendation on whether we should construct our own system or tie into Westmoreland (Westmoreland/Fayette Municipal Authority)," Killinger said.

The DEP's Betsy Mallison said the state agency is working with the township to bring public sewage to the area.

But no matter what is decided, Killinger said it will still be at least two years before anything comes to fruition.

"He (Pirl) could tap into Everson's line if he got permission from Everson and from the railroad for his line to go under the tracks," Killinger said.

"It will cost about $800 if we can get permission from the railroad," Pletcher said, indicating he would pursue that course of action if nothing else works with the township.

"He pays his taxes," Pletcher said. "I just don't understand why the supervisors can't help."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me