ShareThis Page

Uniontown Councilman stays on GOP ballot

| Friday, March 9, 2012

Uniontown Councilman Gary Gearing will remain on the primary ballot in a bid for a state House seat.

In an order handed down on Thursday, Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough denied a petition to have Gearing's name removed from the ballot for the Republican nomination for state representative in the 51st District.

Through Pittsburgh attorney Ronald Brown, registered Republican voters Thomas R. Murray II and Robin Lynn Amend had sought to set aside Gearing's nominating petition. They argued Gearing's petition was short the required number of valid signatures.

A hearing was held last week in Pittsburgh. Yesterday, McCullough entered an order denying the petition to remove Gearing from the ballot. An opinion detailing her reasons for the denial was not immediately available.

Gearing's attorney, Lawrence Otter of Doylestown, said he was pleased with McCullough's ruling.

"We're delighted we were able to pull the rabbit out of the hat," Otter said. "I'm delighted he'll remain on the ballot."

Brown said yesterday that he had "no indication" whether his clients planned to appeal.

"It was a very close case. Even though the judge refused to strike the petition, (only) 302 valid signatures (were approved)," Brown said.

No other candidates are listed as seeking the Republican nomination. The only other would-be candidate for the Republican nomination, Michael Cavanagh of Uniontown, was stricken from the ballot because he has a criminal conviction for insurance fraud.

The incumbent, state Rep. Tim Mahoney of Uniontown, is the only candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the seat.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me