ShareThis Page
Sports

Cenkner takes second at WPIALs

Chris Harlan
| Saturday, April 16, 2011

Mt. Pleasant's David Cenkner wasn't sure if he'd ever played tennis in blustery conditions quite like these.

"Maybe not this windy," said Cenkner, who watched the wind whip around the courts at Norwin. "It's pretty bad out here."

But the senior wouldn't blame Friday's weather for finishing second. Cenkner lost to Winchester Thurston's Daniel Goldblum in the final of the WPIAL Class AA boys singles championship.

It was Goldblum, he said, who was most influential.

"I played his style," Cenkner said, "which isn't a good thing. That's why I lost."

Cenkner lost, 6-2, 6-4. Most of the match was played from the baseline, with the two exchanging long returns. That fit Goldblum's powerful style.

"That's all he wanted to do," Cenkner said. "I probably should have closed the net a lot more times. That would have been different."

Goldblum, a senior, also won the WPIAL singles title in 2009. The Mt. Lebanon native didn't play high school tennis as a junior, instead focusing on USTA tournaments.

He too was bothered by the wind.

"The conditions made it just a dogfight out there," Goldblum said. "Everything I learned about tennis wasn't out the window but close to it. This was about who was willing to run down the most shots."

Cenkner won three times Thursday at Keystone Oaks to reach the championship match, qualifying him a spot in the next month's state tournament. The top three finishers advanced.

Cenkner also qualified for states last season when he finished third in the WPIAL.

"My game has improved so much over the past two months," he said. "It's been unreal. I'm pretty confident heading to states."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me