ShareThis Page
News

Man injured in crash

| Tuesday, March 15, 2005

RAYBURN -- Joseph Barber, 32, of New Stanton, was flown by medical helicopter to UPMC Presbyterian Hospital in Pittsburgh following a crash just after midnight Monday, state police said.

Barber was traveling east on Route 85 at 12:01 a.m. Monday when police said he failed to negotiate a curve in the road in his 1993 Mazda Protege, striking a split rail fence, a wooden walkway, mailboxes, and a utility pole.

Police said after striking the fence and other objects, the car traveled another 50 feet and struck a large pine tree before coming to rest.

Police said Barber was taken to Armstrong County Memorial Hospital before being flown to the Pittsburgh hospital. He was listed in fair condition Monday afternoon, according to a hospital spokesperson.

Police said the investigation is continuing, but believe driving at an unsafe speed was the cause of the crash.

Police said the damaged fence and walkway are owned by Marsha Getty of Kittanning RD5, while the damaged mailbox and tree are owned by John Gerboc, also of Kittanning RD5.

Rayburn Township and West Kittanning fire departments, along with Kittanning Hose Co. 6 Ambulance, assisted at the scene.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me