ShareThis Page
News

Worthington gets $3 million for sewers

| Thursday, Nov. 10, 2005

WORTHINGTON -- Homeowners facing high sewage bills to use an expanded sewer system may have gotten the break they were hoping for thanks to nearly $3 million in grants and loans awarded Wednesday.

The Worthington-West Franklin Joint Municipal Authority has been hoping that funds from the state's PENNVEST program would afford them the ability to expand the sewer system through the borough and nearby neighborhoods using 90,000 feet of sewer lines and construction of a treatment plant and pumping station.

Dwight Claypoole, chair of the authority, said he was "humbly appreciative" of the announcement Tuesday and hoped it would allow the authority to go ahead with construction of the system at a lower cost to customers than previously projected.

"With the cost of the project coming in higher than expected, we would have had to charge customers almost $60 a month to help pay for the system," he said. "Now, with this extra money, we are hoping to be able to drop that to about $50."

The municipal authority was waiting for the announcement because the project bids expire on Nov. 30, Claypoole said.

"If we would have had to wait until spring and rebid the project, it would have cost who knows how much more," he said. "Hopefully we can now accept the bids and move forward with the project as we planned."

"I know that we can't please everyone in this situation, but we are going to try to maintain a balance of rural, agricultural space and development in the area," he said. "We want to be able to bring the infrastructure here so we can bring controlled development here."

State Sen. Don White, R-41st, and state Rep. Jeff Pyle, R-60th, said they were happy they could help provide the additional funding the authority needed to move the project forward. Both had been asked by the authority to assist in providing additional funds.

"This is an important project and this money may have just helped save it from being scrapped," White said.

The project estimate was $12.4 million, with the authority left to come up with an additional $4 million to be able to go ahead with the project. The authority had received $1 million from the Rural Utility Service, leaving it to come up with $2.9 million.

The PENNVEST money awarded Tuesday came in the form of a $1 million grant and a $1.9 million low interest loan, giving the authority the rest of the money needed, Claypoole said.

The expanded system is to provide service to 715 customers in Worthington Borough, Claypoole Road, Craigsville and Laird's Crossing.

The municipal authority will vote on the project at its scheduled meeting on Monday at 7 p.m. in the municipal authority's office on East Main Street.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me