ShareThis Page

Philippa Gregory continues compelling saga in 'Red Queen'

| Sunday, Aug. 22, 2010

Philippa Gregory, author of "The Other Boleyn Girl," continues her saga of the Wars of the Roses with a fictional biography of Margaret Beaufort, the grandmother of King Henry VIII.

The wars between the Houses of York and Lancaster involved on-and-off fighting for about 30 years. They ended when Margaret's son, Henry Tudor, killed Richard III in 1485 and married his niece, joining the two families.

After a half-dozen novels focusing on the Tudor dynasty, Gregory stepped back into England's medieval period last year with "The White Queen," about Elizabeth Woodville, the matriarch of the House of York. "The Red Queen" is both a follow-up and companion to that novel, covering the same period from a different perspective. The novels share some of the same scenes, rendered different by the characters' opposing views.

"The Red Queen" starts when mad King Henry VI marries Margaret, his 12-year-old cousin, to his half brother, Edmund Tudor, who is twice her age. Their son, born while Margaret is still a child, comes just as the wars are starting. She vows he will become king and spends the next several decades plotting to return England to her family's control.

Gregory's Margaret is an egomaniac who believes herself chosen by God and aspires to be a holy warrior like Joan of Arc. Unloved by her mother and left vulnerable by her father's suicide, she's insecure and jealous. Elizabeth Woodville in "The White Queen" gives her little thought, but homely Margaret obsesses about the beautiful woman she believes has taken her rightful place as England's queen.

Edmund dies quickly, and Margaret's mother marries her off in short order to another English lord. When he, too, is killed in the wars, she marries treacherous Thomas Stanley, who will turn the tide of battle in her son's favor.

There are moments when Margaret could be a sympathetic character: Married at 12, she's raped repeatedly by a husband intent on producing a potential heir to the throne. Having endured an agonizing birth at the hands of inept midwives, she can't conceive again.

But, instead, Gregory chooses -- much as she did with Woodville's power-hungry queen in "The White Queen" -- to go against the grain. Her Margaret is self-absorbed, cold-hearted and grandiose in her ambitions. She sacrifices her relationship with the one person she might love, her brother-in-law, Jasper Tudor, to marry and plot with Stanley. Near the end of the novel, Margaret reflects that she wouldn't have much use for her son if he weren't the focus of her plan to gain power.

Although Margaret is a sour pill, Gregory's novel is not. She again brings insight to English history, recreating the power struggle between two of the nation's most notable women in a tale fresh for modern readers. There's no question that she is the best at what she does.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me