ShareThis Page

Daughters get their day in Tayari Jones' 'Silver Sparrow'

| Sunday, June 12, 2011

It may not match "Call me Ishmael," but one could do worse than opening a novel with "My father, James Witherspoon, is a bigamist."

That's how Tayari Jones begins "Silver Sparrow," her third novel, which chronicles two African-American families in Jones' native Atlanta.

James may be the common denominator joining those families together, but "Silver Sparrow" belongs to his two daughters, born four months apart in 1969.

The illegitimate Dana is older and gets to tell her story first, but she is second in almost every other way as she grows up in the shadows with her mother, Gwen.

James may visit them once a week for dinner. And James clearly loves Dana, contributing toward her education from his earnings as a chauffeur and worrying that the punk she dates in high school will leave her high and dry.

But despite his nominal presence in her life, James is largely absent, and it takes its toll on Dana's self-esteem. She and her mother spy on James' legitimate family, pining for what they do not have -- even as they recognize that they "lived in a world where you could never want what you wanted out in the open."

Beautiful and smart, Dana reaches her teen years fueled by increasing insecurity and resentment that she is playing second fiddle to her sister, Chaurisse, who has no idea Dana even exists -- let alone any notion of the sacrifices Dana and Gwen make to preserve Chaurisse's blissful ignorance.

Chaurisse gets her turn in the novel's second half. More secure than Dana, she speaks in a lighter and bouncier voice, and her often wise and good-natured humor contrasts starkly with Dana's unpredictable moods.

"My mother," Chaurisse tells us, "could be anyone's mother -- as medium as my father, but a bit on the plump side. If you saw them walking down the street, if you noticed them at all, you would think the two of them might produce invisible children."

Chaurisse is much too funny to ever be invisible, but she knows she is average and largely accepts it; comfortably middle class, she can afford to. Her world revolves around her mother's in-home beauty salon and parents whose love for her goes unquestioned.

As the sisters' creator, Jones herself has tried to be a good parent, scrupulously dividing the pages and attention she gives her offspring.

Chaurisse is more rounded and accessible, making her easier to understand and like.

But Dana's forbidden and inexpressible desires make her secrecy inevitable while giving her good reason for acting out as she does -- even when that means stalking her sister, which sets in motion the inevitable collision between James' two carefully separated worlds. Dana is harder to know, but she isn't underwritten.

I can't say the same for Jones' male characters; the most important of whom get evenhanded treatment but nevertheless remain on the thin side. Even James is more of a plot device than a person, confirming Gwen's observation that "a man is just a man, and that's all we have to work with."

Jones' women, on the other hand, are all drawn well, from the sisters and their mothers to minor characters such as the sisters' dying grandmother and Gwen's wisecracking friend, Willie Mae. The exchanges between mothers and daughters are often moving and always ring true. Despite an overly tidy plot, so does the novel as a whole.

Jones gives us permission to love all of its women, though they are flawed and often refuse to love each other. That's a recipe for great book club discussions, and I wouldn't be surprised to see "Silver Sparrow" featured in many.

Additional Information:

Get the book

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me