ShareThis Page

Review: Singers triumph in Pittsburgh Opera's 'Onegin'

| Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2009

The G-20 summit unintentionally cast extra light on the Saturday night opening of Pittsburgh Opera's season because other Cultural District events were cancelled or rescheduled. The opera's presentation of "Eugene Onegin" was up to the challenge, for the most part, because it was an impressively sung performance of a gorgeous, yet neglected, opera that was limited mostly by uninspiring sets.

From the moment soprano Anna Samuil began singing, the performance hit its groove. She was a wonderful Tatiana, and her excellence was not isolated. She was quickly joined in the opening ensemble by the worthy Lindsay Ammann as her sister, Olga. Ammann's performance, including her own aria, was especially impressive because she is a first-year resident artist of Pittsburgh Opera.

Strength went to strength as the other women on stage -- Susanne Mentzer as the girls' mother, Madame Larina, and Sustan Toth Shafer as nurse, Filipyevna -- also were well-matched and individually compelling. Thus the opening ensemble, in duos and quartets, was thoroughly enchanting.

Opposites attract, and not, when poet Vladimir Lensky and his friend, Eugene Onegin, call on the Larin family. The scale of Raymond Very's tenor suited Lensky. He conveyed not only his character's sincere love for the extroverted Olga but also how much he loves being a poet. Tatiana is smitten with Onegin.

In the next scene, late at night in Tatiana's bedroom, Samuil offered a brilliant, dramatically fluent performance of the Letter Scene, in which she professes her love to Onegin. Samuil's mixture of vocal acting and body language was complete, while her vocal line was so clear and clean it was breathtaking. She fully conveyed the distance Tatiana travels to overcome fear and find the excitement of romantic feelings in her own words and life, not a book's.

Dwayne Croft was outstanding as Onegin. In the final scene of Act I, he brought just the right cold dignity to his role's best and worst moment. It's true, as he sings, that he would be a bad husband, but he breaks Tatiana's heart.

Sam Helfrich directed a very well acted performance. But there were odd moments in the duel scene in Act II, which is prompted by Lensky's jealousy after Onegin flirts with Olga. In Helfrich's staging, Onegin doesn't look as he fires the fatal shot. Of course, this conveys Onegin's ambivalence about shooting his friend, but he's much too selfish a creature to take a chance when his own life is at stake.

The opera concludes three years later when Tatiana is married to Prince Gremin. Samuil and Croft achieved great intensity in their final scene, in which Onegin belatedly realizes he loves Tatiana and begs her to leave her husband. Samuil's triumph in the role was completed in this scene, in which she was not a tower of strength but rather was strong in the face of real temptation. The curtain falls with Onegin as crushed as Tatiana had been in Act I.

Music director Antony Walker led an energetic performance with considerably lyrical sensitivity. The orchestra played well for a first performance of music the opera hasn't performed since 1991. The chorus was fabulously spirited and well balanced.

Finally, about those sets. The most ridiculous items were cutout birch trees and berry bushes in Act I. The paint on the panels that were supposed to represent the bushes was so faded you could hardly make out what they were supposed to be, let alone believe they'd bear fruit. The columns at a St. Petersburg Palace in the last act were so wide and shallow they were nearly cutouts. The lighting was not impressive.

Yet, Pittsburgh Opera's production of "Eugene Onegin" is not to be missed, because issues with the sets fade quickly in the presence of great singing.

Additional Information:

'Eugene Onegin'

Presented by: Pittsburgh Opera

When: 7 p.m. Tuesday, 8 p.m. Friday and 2 p.m. Sunday

Admission: $10.50-$140.50

Where: Benedum Center, Downtown

Details: 412-456-6666

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me