ShareThis Page
Business

AFL-CIO head calls for union solidarity

| Tuesday, June 21, 2005

WASHINGTON -- AFL-CIO President John Sweeney pledged Monday to do everything he can to hold the labor federation together amid a rift with some of the biggest unions in the country.

"Only our enemies are cheering" for divisions in the labor movement, Sweeney said as union leaders representing more than 60 percent of the AFL-CIO's 13 million members lined up in favor of his re-election.

"The millions of workers who need us don't need to see the house of labor divided," Sweeney said.

At a news conference, Sweeney said the federation will continue a conversation with the five unions opposing him.

Those unions, including the AFL-CIO's largest, the Service Employees International Union, blame Sweeney's 10-year tenure for declining union membership and fewer worker protections.

Union membership has been on a downward slide for 50 years, now representing 12.5 percent of all U.S. workers. The private sector union membership level is 8 percent. A half-century ago, one-third of workers in the private sector belonged to unions.

The 1.8 million-member SEIU wants the federation to cut its budget by more than 50 percent and use the savings to increase organizing by its member unions.

The SEIU, once headed by Sweeney, is threatening to leave the AFL-CIO, along with the United Food and Commercial Workers and Unite Here, which represents employees in the hotel and restaurant industries and textile manufacturing. The Teamsters board will vote in July on whether to give President James Hoffa authority to disaffiliate.

The five dissident unions formed an alliance last week they call the Change to Win Coalition. The other participant is the Laborers International Union.

The AFL-CIO laid off 167 employees recently as part of Sweeney's plan to increase spending on union membership drives, a move his critics called too little, too late.

Flanking Sweeney, his supporters expressed the hope that a healthy discussion will help clarify the future course of organized labor.

"At the end of that debate, we should be stronger, not weaker," Morton Bahr, president of the Communications Workers of America, said.

Sweeney has focused on political action over the years, a push reflected in an increase in union households as a percentage of voters.

Voters from union households represented 26 percent of the overall vote in 2000, compared with 23 percent in 1996 and 19 percent in 1992.

The complaining unions say the AFL-CIO has wasted time and money on politics and has not done enough to combat the steady decline in union membership.

Sweeney faces re-election at the federation's convention in July in Chicago, where he is expected to win another four-year term.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me