ShareThis Page
Business

Southwest 3rd-busiest carrier at airport

| Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2005

Southwest Airlines continued to flex its money-saving muscles at Pittsburgh International Airport in June, becoming the facility's third-busiest air carrier in just its second month of operation.

In June, the Dallas-based discount airline carried 57,104 passengers, nearly 10,000 more flyers than it carried in May. Only US Airways, which loaded and unloaded 605,881 passengers, and Delta Airlines, which carried 71,526 passengers, finished the month ahead of Southwest at Pittsburgh International.

June figures show that every airline except US Airways reported a passenger increase at Pittsburgh International. Excluding US Airways, all other carriers handled 416,238 passengers, up 48.3 percent from June 2004's total of 280,726.

"When that many airlines report increased traffic figures, it is good news," Allegheny County Airport Authority Executive Director Kent G. George said in a statement. "People are taking advantage of the choices and lower fares available to them."

US Airways saw its June traffic count drop 40 percent year-over-year, to 605,881 from just over 1 million passengers last year. More than 1 million total passengers traveled through Pittsburgh International in June, the first time the million-passenger mark has been reached since October. Still, the airport's total was down 20.8 percent from June 2004.

The largest jump in passenger traffic on a percentage basis was recorded by Midwest Connect, which saw the number jump 143.1 percent, to 4,816 in June from 1,981 one year ago.

Through the first six months of 2005, total traffic loaded and unloaded was down 24.2 percent, to 5.2 million from 6.8 million in 2004.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me