ShareThis Page

Faulty financial papers costing Washington County firm $44 million

| Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Lax or nonexistent documentation of stock options granted by Black Box Corp. to its executives so far has cost the company $44.7 million in expense charges, according to new securities filings.

The Lawrence, Washington County-based technical services company has been conducting an internal investigation of financial statements dating back to 1992. Since the options-backdating scandal broke about a year ago, more than 180 companies have received at least a notice of an informal request for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Some 300-plus pages of restated quarterly financial results dating back to 2005 were filed late Tuesday. The probe was triggered by a informal inquiry letter last November by the SEC. The scrutiny of the company has evolved into a formal investigation of Black Box's stock option practices.

While not mentioned in yesterday's financial restatements, one casualty of the company's stock option problems is believed to have been Fred C. Young, who resigned in May following nine years as the company's chief executive.

A Black Box spokesman could not be reached for comment.

After-tax charges through Dec. 30 for the stock option mistakes totaled $44.7 million, the new filings show. In addition, related legal and other fees have cost Black Box about $600,000, although the company hopes some of the expenses will be reimbursed by insurance. The company indicated that still-to-be-determined tax liabilities could add another $3.6 million or more to the total expenses.

"During the review period, few option grants were approved in complete compliance with the company's stock option plans," Black Box said in the filings. According to audit committee findings, "there is either no or inadequate documentation of approval actions that satisfies the requisites for establishing a measurement date," upon which options are granted.

Of the 69 stock option grant dates recorded during the examination period, there were proper approvals for only 12, the audit committee found. Some approval documents are inconsistent or conflict with other documents, rendering them unreliable, the committee said.

The documents state the audit committee and other relevant board committees will continue to review and implement procedural enhancements and remedial actions.

Black Box said in a filing yesterday that the Nasdaq stock market granted its request to continue listing its common stock, provided that Black Box file its annual report by Aug. 13 for the year ended March 31.

Black Box's stock closed yesterday at $42.64, down 92 cents.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me