ShareThis Page

40 carpenters awarded $95,291 in overtime pay

| Thursday, Nov. 20, 2008

The Labor Department said Wednesday that Consolidated Building Systems of Grand Ledge, Mich., has agreed to pay $95,291 to 40 carpenters who did not get prevailing wages or overtime in 2007 and 2008 while working on low-income housing projects at the Bedford Hill Apartments in Pittsburgh's Hill District, and Laurel Estates in Uniontown. Consolidated Building Systems was a subcontractor on the two housing projects funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The company violated overtime provisions by not paying carpenters 1 1/2 times their regular wage when they worked more than 40 hours a week, and its records did not accurately reflect the number of hours the carpenters worked, said John DuMont, director of the department's Pittsburgh wage and hour division office, which conducted the probe. Consolidated Building could not be reached for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me