ShareThis Page
Business

Mutual fund returns soar beyond wildest dreams in one year

| Monday, Sept. 28, 2009

Suddenly, the 100% club isn't so exclusive anymore.

An astonishing 426 stock mutual funds have soared 100% or more since the Standard & Poor's 500 index bottomed March 9. The average stock fund is up 65%.

Direxion Financial Bull 3X -- the top-performing fund -- has rocketed to a 560% gain, according to Lipper. The fund uses futures and options to gain 3% on days when the Russell financial services index gains 1%.

Oceanstone -- the hottest fund that doesn't use leverage -- has gained 370%. The tiny $2.5 million fund made a big hit with Dollar Thrifty Automotive, up 1,919% the past six months, and Avis Budget Group, up 1,538%.

What makes the hot funds hot:

Lots of leverage. Many of the top performers, such as Direxion Financial Bull 3X, goose their returns through futures and options. The ride is great on the way up and hell on the way down. Its bear-market equivalent, Direxion Financial Bear 3X, falls 3% on days when the Russell financial-services index gains 1%. A $10,000 investment in the fund March 9 would be worth $195 -- a 98% loss. To get back even, you would have to gain more than 5,000%.

Low, low prices. Some of the hottest funds took big hits in the bear market. Financial-services funds, for example, have jumped an average 119% since the bull market started; but they fell 70% in the bear market.

"It makes perfect sense," said Russel Kinnel, director of mutual-fund research at Morningstar, the Chicago investment trackers. "The best stuff was the stuff that was oversold the most."

Sector savvy. Fidelity Select Automotive has driven to a 244% gain. And the SPDR S&P Metals and Mining ETF uncovered a 129% gain.

International allure. Emerging markets have soared since the bull market started, and so have the funds that invest there. For example, the Market Vectors Indonesia index fund has leapt 171%.

The 100% club isn't limited to tiny funds, however.

The $33.2 billion Dodge & Cox International stock fund, for example, has gained 102%. Other winners:

• Fidelity Value, with $7.5 billion, is up 105%.

• Oakmark International, $3.8 billion, up 102%.

• Vanguard REIT Index, $3.2 billion, up 112%

The 100% club, however, has its risks. The last time a large number of funds gained 100% or more in a year was 1999, during the dot-com bubble.

The average technology fund still is down 25%.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me