ShareThis Page

Experts decry possible mortgage deduction changes

| Thursday, Nov. 25, 2010

Long considered a key ingredient of American home ownership, the income-tax deduction for mortgage interest now is on the menu of the commission looking for ways to trim the federal deficit.

Among the $3.8 trillion in debt-cutting options being considered by National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform is a scaled-down tax deduction eliminating second homes, mortgages of more than $500,000 and home-equity loans.

Reaction to even the hint of a change came quickly -- and stridently.

"For a battered housing industry, which is struggling with a 21 percent unemployment rate among construction workers, this is absolutely the worst time to be considering changes," said National Association of Home Builders President Bob Jones.

Diminishing or ending the deduction "would exert further downward pressure on home prices, leaving more homeowners with mortgages larger than the value of their property and fueling even more foreclosures," he said.

Mortgage Bankers Association Chairman Michael D. Berman said that while his group's members shared in the growing concern about the federal deficit, limiting the use of the mortgage-interest deduction "will have negative repercussions for consumers and home values up and down the housing chain."

Given "the fragile state" of the housing market, Berman said, "now is not the time to be scaling back incentives for home ownership."

For its part, the National Association of Realtors has decided to wait and see. The deficit commission is not scheduled to submit its report until Dec. 1, so "any comments at this point would premature and based on conjecture," said spokesman Walt Molony.

Noelle M. Barbone, office manager at Weichert Realtors in Media, who has been selling real estate since 1969, said eliminating the deduction would be "a slap in the face to the American property owner."

"Little by little, the government is attacking one of the most important leverages it has in the economy today," Barbone said, adding that real estate should not be viewed as "the ATM for government spending."

The mortgage-interest deduction is to housing policy "what Social Security reform has traditionally been to politics: the third rail," said Kevin Gillen, vice president at Econsult Corp. in Philadelphia, though consensus among economists is that the deduction is regressive and promotes overconsumption.

Regressive because "it not only favors homeowners over renters -- renters are, on average, poorer -- but it also favors wealthier homeowners over relatively low-income homeowners," who typically don't itemize on their tax returns, he said. And it promotes consumption of more housing than one might otherwise purchase "because you can take on more mortgage debt."


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me