ShareThis Page

Right side's all wrong for gas cap, driver says

| Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010

Q: Why in the world are American car manufacturers now putting the gas cap on the wrong side of the car• What was wrong with the driver's side, where it belongs• I can understand European cars not locating the cap on the left because they drive on the left side of the road.

-- Fred Kleppsattel, Orlando, Fla.

A: Fred, drivers have been asking that question for decades. The central reason the filler locations are where they are is mostly packaging. The engine configuration, which often dictates which is the easiest side to route the exhaust system down, sometimes means there's room available on the other side of the car for the fuel tank.

The past four test cars I've had were from four separate places -- a Korean car (gas cap on the driver's side), European (passenger side), Japanese (driver's side) and American (passenger side).

Years ago, I did a reader survey on the topic, and most preferred the cap on the driver's side -- it's easier to get to, and when you are pulling up next to the pumps, which may be protected by posts or bars that are below the driver's sight line, it's easier when those barriers are on the driver's side.

Q: On a TV show about cars, the host referred to what I think was a "bot dot." Is there such a thing, and if so, what is it?

-- Bart, Clermont, Fla.

A: That would be "Botts' dots," the little round markers glued to the road, usually on top of a painted line, that tell drivers they are straying outside their lane. They are named (and no, I'm not making this up) for the inventor, transportation engineer Elbert Botts, who died in 1962.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me