ShareThis Page

The friendship that made America

| Sunday, June 10, 2007

"Adopted Son: Washington, Lafayette, and the Friendship That Saved the Revolution" by David A. Clary. Bantam, $27, 592 pages.

When the United States entered World War I, the first American troops to land in Europe shouted "Lafayette, we are here!" to the cheering French crowds. This battle cry was an acknowledgment of the great debt their country owed to the Marquis de Lafayette. Few men, and particularly few men so young, have played such a pivotal role in shaping the history of two continents as the Lafayette.

In spite of his fame during his lifetime, Lafayette has been largely forgotten by history -- his memory preserved in a few place names, such as Western Pennsylvania's Fayette County or as a footnote in the biographies of his contemporaries. David A. Clary's "Adopted Son: Washington, Lafayette, and the Friendship That Saved the Revolution" seeks to correct this historical oversight.

The Marquis de Lafayette was born into an aristocratic family with a long and glorious martial tradition stretching back to the crusades. When his father was cut down by an English cannonball, Lafayette inherited one of the largest fortunes in France.

Most young men of Lafayette's social rank and financial means spent their days living in exquisite splendor and seeking favor at the French court. Why did Lafayette choose, instead, a life of great personal sacrifice dedicated to defending human rights• Clary's well-written book makes the case that it was Lafayette's great admiration and friendship with George Washington that transformed him into one of history's greatest champions of freedom.

Although the French government generally supported the American cause, France was technically neutral when Lafayette joined a group of fellow officers intent on joining Washington's army. When word of the 19-year-old marquis' intentions leaked out, the king issued an arrest warrant and Lafayette was forced to leave his homeland in disguise. An outlaw in his native land, he was hardly welcomed by the American government.

The Congress had been besieged by a steady stream of Europeans seeking their fortune serving in the American army. Most were poorly qualified and sought command positions expecting generous rewards. Lafayette arrived carrying a letter of introduction from Silas Deane, the leader of the congressional mission to the French court, so he was granted an interview with John Hancock.

The young man's humility and enthusiasm charmed the patriot leader. Lafayette explained that he sought no command and only wished to serve as a volunteer under the great Gen. Washington. The fact that he was willing to serve without compensation, paying his own expenses, also made an impression on the cash-strapped American government.

Lafayette was awestruck at his first meeting with Washington. He saw the general as the embodiment of military valor. For his part, Washington liked the young man and later in life said at their first meeting that he deemed the marquis worthy of "esteem and attachment." The two men shared much in common; both had been orphaned at a young age, and both had chosen a life of service rather than privilege. Both burned with a desire to make their mark on history.

The shared hardships of the revolution forged an unbreakable bond between the two men. Lafayette's cool courage under fire and concern for his troops endeared him to both the army and its commander. Lafayette's personal bravery and creative leadership turned the tide in the Americans' favor in several key battles.

On many occasions, Lafayette fed and clothed his troops out of his own pocket, and on one occasion paid the back wages of a disgruntled American unit, preventing a mutiny.

His greatest service to the revolution might have been his steadfast loyalty to Washington during the "Conway Cabal." Lafayette's support was a major factor in foiling this attempt to remove Washington as commander of the American army. Washington wrote of Lafayette, "I do not know a nobler, finer soul, and I love him as a son." The usually emotionally reserved Washington openly wept at their final parting.

After returning to France, Lafayette continued to serve his adopted country. He successfully lobbied the French government for loans and trade concessions. His diplomatic mission to Spain staved off a war over navigation rights on the Mississippi, paving the way for the Louisiana Purchase. His experience of the American Revolution transformed the 19-year-old boy in search of adventure and glory into a tireless fighter for democracy and human rights.

Lafayette played an important part in the French Revolution, wrote the "European Declaration of the Rights of Man" and was imprisoned for his outspoken defense of freedom and the rule of law. For the rest of his long life, Lafayette fought for religious freedom, democracy and the abolition of slavery. Upon his death in 1834, Lafayette was eulogized by John Quincy Adams, who said, "Pronounce him one of the first men of his age, and you have not yet done him justice."

David Clary's fine book is a great read. It is part adventure story and part the story of a young man growing to manhood, but first and foremost it is a story of a great friendship, the friendship of George Washington and his "adopted son" the Marquis de Lafayette.

Jim Busch is a freelance writer from White Oak.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me