ShareThis Page
Home

Mom receives award for courage in the face of peer pressure

| Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Question: Of late, our 8-year-old daughter has not been completing chores and following directions. On the morning of a recent soccer game, she again failed to follow some simple directions. On the way to the game, I calmly told her that when we arrived, she would tell her coach she was unable to play, because she had not followed her parent's directions at home.

She balked, so I told her that either she obeyed or she would miss the remainder of the soccer season. She complied, and we went home where she sulked a good bit before ultimately realizing that it was better to follow directions. Was I too harsh• Some of my friends seem to think so.

Answer: Your friends are jealous that you are able to do what they cannot bring themselves to do: discipline their children with purpose. They envy you, but are unable to admit their envy (also known as "denial"). They wish you would not be a constant reminder to them of their weakness. I encourage you to never surrender to their pressure. Keep up the good work.

Perhaps through your good example, you eventually will rescue one or two of them from the belittling confines of the "Good Mommy Box."

Concerning what you did: I have said it many times, but it bears repeating: There is no point to a consequence if it does not produce a permanent memory. Your daughter will tell this story to her grandchildren some day. More immediately, and as you have witnessed, this experience has greatly contributed to her rehabilitation.

As a result of your courage in the face of peer pressure, you are this week's winner of my "Let 'Em Know You Mean Business" award. Congratulations.

Question: My 8-year-old son is the youngest in his third-grade class. Some students are more than a year older, because most parents are holding back boys these days. I am concerned because he is really struggling socially.

His old friends are leaving him out. He says he has only one friend who is also younger and kind of immature. Should we consider holding him back a grade to see whether that helps?

Answer: If he is performing at grade level, then holding him back would be an example of robbing Peter to pay Paul -- solving one problem, maybe, but definitely creating another. I was the youngest in my class, always (I did not turn 18 until November of my freshman year in college), and, while I retrospectively recognize that "maturity issues" were a problem for me, in the final analysis, they were not any more problematic than the other sorts of problems my older classmates were dealing with in their lives.

Let's face it: Problems of one sort or another are the inevitable result of being human and alive. They are unavoidable. Today's parents, and moms, in particular, think they are responsible for solving all of their children's problems and, therefore, emancipating young adults who are devoid of "issues."

It can't be done, and the attempt to do it damages both mother and child in ways that ultimately are worse than the original problems.

I simply would tell your son that everyone has problems of one sort or another. In every case, our problems can strengthen us or weaken us, depending on whether we do or do not step up to the plate and deal with them as best we can. You can, and should, help him deal with his social problems.

Find after-school social groups for him where the children are his age, for example. But you might try to actually solve his problem at his peril.

Family psychologist John Rosemond can be reached at www.rosemond.com .


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me