ShareThis Page
Home

Vegas on the Mon benefits Leukemia & Lymphoma Society

| Sunday, Nov. 7, 2010

High-rollers were ready to raise the stakes on Thursday for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's annual Vegas on the Mon at LeMont, cashing in on their good luck (and bad) in an elbow-only room crowd of 450.

"I get killed every time I come here," laughed Julian Neiser, no doubt why he consistently gets an invite.

Over at the slots, Greg Heddaeus and Katie Ann Sebastiano weren't above wagering whether or not they'd lose their shirts, "Probably!" Greg mused, while honoree Jack Kessler and honorary chair Dr. Stanley Marks were spotted at the roulette wheel.

Elsewhere, Debbie Barbarita wowed in an ooh-la-la leopard number on the arm of her lucky plus one, Mike, while co-chairs Ralph and Sharon Martin and Jeff and Paula Conn tried their best to shout out opening remarks while the bar crowd momentarily forgot what the chiming of a glass meant.

"I only have one job ... so far I'm not doing it very well since I don't have everyone's attention," mused Ralph.

Most of the dealers found themselves sitting on their hands for awhile before people began stacking their chips (and finishing the buffet), although once the games began, over $350K was raised for LLS, some of which we found was gleefully wagered with the help of someone else's wallet.

"I gave Kirk (Peters) my money...where did he go• He ran off with my money!" laughed Jim Leonard.

Photo Galleries

Vegas on the Mon

Vegas on the Mon

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Vegas on the Mon benefit held at LeMont, Thursday, November, 4, 2010.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me