ShareThis Page
Home

Food fight: Margaritas

| Thursday, May 3, 2007

Rob Amen: How does Cinco de Mayo translate in Pittsburghese, n'at?

Rochelle Hentges: Tequila and strawberries• I'm there. Hold the salt.

Mad Mex Multiple locations including 370 Atwood St., Oakland $7.50 for 16 oz.

Rob: Wow. Plenty of strawberries in this salty 16-ounce "ladies" size, enough to qualify as a serving of fruit. The lime is a given. But the excessive salty aftertaste left me craving a glass of water to chase it.

Rochelle: Whew, even splitting one of these, I'm a little buzzed. But even though real strawberries were used (with floating seeds as evidence), the fruit flavor was a little lackluster. Thankfully, I didn't taste that much salt.

Salsarita's Fresh Cantina 152 East Bridge St., The Waterfront $3.99 for 12 oz.

Rob: Kudos for plenty of crushed ice. But the proportions were backwards. There was hardly a hint of tequila, and the artificial strawberry flavor was overwhelming. Pass me a Dos Equis instead.

Rochelle: You must not be a fan of smoothies, because this tastes just like one. A very good one. However, this margarita might not be the best bet if you're looking to dance around the sombrero -- it's a little light on the alcohol.

T.G.I. Friday's Multiple locations including 185 Waterfront Dr., The Waterfront $6.99 for 18 oz.

Rob: With the texture of a Slush Puppie, this towering concoction proved to be just right. Lots of crushed ice. Plenty of real strawberry flavor. Slightly less salty than Mad Mex. Let me make sure ... yup. The best of the bunch.

Rochelle: Seriously• This was gross. You thought Mad Mex was salty• I could have chased this with ocean water and not been able to tell the difference. And no, the lime and orange wedge presentation does not make up for this waste of seven bucks.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me