ShareThis Page
News Columnists

Vanishing act left to pros

| Sunday, Sept. 16, 2007

When Mike Veon wanted documents destroyed, he didn't trust the task to amateurs.

When Veon wanted sensitive paperwork not just discarded, but shredded and reduced to unrecoverable nothingness, he turned to the professionals.

Veon, of Beaver Falls, is the former Democratic House minority whip. Defeated in his re-election bid last year, he now toils in Harrisburg as a lobbyist.

Veon's name has surfaced prominently in state Attorney General Tom Corbett's investigation into $3.6 million in bonuses paid to state legislative staffers in 2005 and 2006. Corbett is probing whether some portion of that money was illegally paid for political work.

The majority of the largest bonuses were paid to people who volunteered on or contributed to the campaigns of Veon, current House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese of Greene County and the House Democratic Campaign Committee.

Last month, Corbett's office raided one of Veon's old haunts, the House Office of Democratic Research, and carted away boxes of records. Whether investigators found anything interesting remains to be seen. But what I found interesting is Veon paying to have what appears to be a voluminous amount of paperwork excised from existence in January.

According to a finance report filed in May, Veon's campaign spent $531 to hire the information management company Iron Mountain to shred documents.

The Boston-based company's Web site isn't shy about the benefits of its shredding service: "Holding information beyond its required retention period incurs unnecessary storage costs and leaves you vulnerable to risks of theft, misuses, disclosure, legal discovery and noncompliance fines."

Iron Mountain refused repeated requests last week to disclose how many documents it would dispose of for $531. What bashful shredders!

So while it is impossible to determine how much paperwork Iron Mountain made vanish for Veon, the company's rates probably are competitive with others, such as Secured Shredding Services of Moon.

Officer manager Julie Hitt said Secured Shredding charges $6 per box of documents destroyed. The boxes are the size of the ones usually found next to office copiers; each one can hold 25 pounds of paper.

"So for $531, you could shred ... " I said.

Hitt quickly did the math: "Eighty-eight boxes."

At 25 pounds per box, that means Veon could have shredded 2,200 pounds of documents had he used Secured Shredding.

Suppose Iron Mountain's rates are twice as high. Unlikely, I know, but in the interest of fairness let's do some supposing.

Veon still would have been able to dispose of more than half a ton of paper.

Veon did not respond to a message left Friday to provide details on the document destruction, but I assume he was just doing a bit of housecleaning.

At this point, not a shred of evidence exists to suggest otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me