ShareThis Page

Students flaunt fluency online

| Thursday, May 15, 2003

This week the Pittsburgh Public Schools has launched online tests to gauge students' fluency in foreign languages.

Pittsburgh Public Schools is one of the few school districts in the nation using this technology to test verbal fluency, said Dr. Thekla Fall, program officer for world languages at the schools.

City schools began using the Internet this week to evaluate more than 1,000 students in French, Spanish, Japanese and German.

The online program is faster and more efficient in testing verbal skills and provides data officials can use to evaluate the district's foreign language program, officials said.

"I don't think many students take a language to learn the grammar, but rather to effectively communicate. This test really shows how well the student is doing in that area," Fall said.

Students log into the program and are presented with real world scenarios, Fall said. For example, one part of the test has a student conversing with a digital hotel clerk about prices and amenities in the hotel, a situation facing most foreign travelers.

The program records the students' responses, which are graded by a foreign language teacher. Previously, students were tested by speaking into a tape recorder and delivering it to a teacher.

She said the taped test takes up to 20 minutes to grade, but grading the online test takes about 10 minutes because it is better structured for grading and the digital recorder is easier to understand.

The testing ends this week, and students should receive their results before school ends in June.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me