ShareThis Page
News

Pitt provost approves region's first nuclear engineering certificates

| Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2007

The region's first graduate and undergraduate certificates in nuclear engineering -- offered through the University of Pittsburgh's Swanson School of Engineering -- have been approved by Pitt Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor James V. Maher, the university announced today.

The program will offer students access to Western Pennsylvania's nuclear energy experts from companies such as Bechtel Bettis Inc., Westinghouse Electric Co., and First Energy Nuclear Operating Co., which operates the Beaver Valley Power Station nuclear power plant in Shippingport. An advisory panel from those companies helped design the curriculum.

"It's natural for Pitt to offer a nuclear engineering education -- we're surrounded by one of the largest concentrations of nuclear engineering experts in the world," nuclear engineer Larry R. Foulke, who directs Pitt's program and serves as a professor, said in a news release. "Our nuclear engineering program is driven by the workforce needs of these facilities. We asked them what knowledge our graduates should have, then designed our courses."

Though Maher only recently approved the courses, Foulke began teaching them last year and the first group to complete the courses is expected to receive their undergraduate certificates at the end of this semester.

A $600,000 educational grant from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and a $100,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Energy will help develop the program, create a distance-learning component for teaching students across Pennsylvania and further the education of nuclear engineers already in the workplace.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me