ShareThis Page

Millions more at risk for diabetes

| Thursday, April 29, 2004

WASHINGTON -- A surprising 41 million Americans have pre-diabetes, high enough blood sugar to dramatically increase their risk of getting the disease, say new government figures that double previous estimates.

The number leaped because doctors have changed the criteria for diagnosing pre-diabetes after research showed that they were missing too many at-risk patients.

"These latest numbers show how urgent the problem really is," said Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, who will announce the new data at a federal health meeting in Baltimore today.

"We need to help Americans take steps to prevent diabetes or we will risk being overwhelmed by the health and economic consequences of an ever-growing diabetes epidemic."

The good news is that modest diet and exercise can delay, if not prevent, the onset of diabetes in many pre-diabetics.

But "most of these people have no idea" they're at risk, said Dr. Francine Kaufman, past president of the American Diabetes Association.

Some 18 million Americans have full-blown diabetes, a leading cause of blindness, kidney failure, amputations and heart disease that claims 180,000 U.S. lives a year.

Some people are born with it, but the vast majority have Type 2 diabetes, an illness that develops, often in middle age, when their bodies lose the ability to turn blood sugar into energy.

That's a very gradual loss, and it can be measured by blood tests. Glucose levels that are above normal but not yet in the diabetic range signal pre-diabetes -- and a change in what one test considers normal prompted the government's new increased estimates.

Doctors once thought blood sugar levels below 110 milligrams as measured by the "impaired fasting glucose" test -- given before eating anything in the morning -- were normal. But the American Diabetes Association in November changed the definition of normal to below 100 milligrams -- meaning anyone with a fasting glucose between 100 and 125 milligrams is now classified pre-diabetic.

That seems like a small change. But a lot of people are in that 100 to 110 range, data that conclude about 40 percent of people ages 40 to 74 are pre-diabetic, explained CDC diabetes chief Dr. Frank Vinicor.

Changing the pre-diabetes cut-off "isn't an arbitrary decision," Vinicor said. "It's based on emerging science from the last two to three years," that found the risk of glucose-spurred heart disease began rising at lower levels than once thought.

Cut-offs for a second test -- where blood sugar levels are measured two hours after a glucose-rich drink -- remain unchanged. Levels between 140 and 199 milligrams are considered pre-diabetic in that test.

So who needs to seek one of these tests• The ADA says:

= People 45 or older who are overweight should seek testing during the next routine doctor visit.

= People 45 or older who are of normal weight should ask their doctor if testing is appropriate.

= Doctors should consider testing younger people if they are overweight and have another risk factor: a diabetic relative; bad cholesterol; high blood pressure; had diabetes during pregnancy or gave birth to a baby bigger than 9 pounds; or belong to a racial minority group.

Doctors typically repeat the test every three years if results are normal, but may test people with multiple risk factors more often.

If the test diagnoses pre-diabetes, there are proven ways to lower the risk of full-blown illness, Vinicor stressed, such as walking 30 minutes a day, five days a week, and losing 5 to 7 percent of body weight.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me