ShareThis Page

Putin nixes media restrictions, blasts crisis coverage

| Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2002

MOSCOW (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin vetoed media legislation Monday that would have sharply restricted terrorism coverage, but he lashed out at the country's press, television and radio for their handing of last month's hostage crisis at a Moscow theater.

The legislation, passed by both houses of parliament, would have prohibited reports seen as hindering counter-terrorist operations and banned the broadcast or publication of rebel statements or extremist "propaganda."

Putin's decision to veto the measure ahead of next year's parliamentary elections was widely seen as an attempt to burnish his image as a defender of free speech. Critics have accused him and his government of cracking down on independent television.

"No truly democratic power can exist without publicity and openness, which are provided by the mass media," Putin said, adding that he had asked parliamentary leaders to form a commission to come up with new legislation.

But the president, who made the announcement during a Kremlin meeting with the heads of major media organizations, also took the opportunity to blast the media for what he considered irresponsible coverage of last month's Moscow theater siege.

"Television pictures from one channel a few minutes before the storming, when the movement of special forces was shown, could have led to an enormous tragedy," Putin told the assembled journalists.

He accused some media of acting irresponsibly to "boost their ratings" and make more money during the hostage crisis.

"The main weapon of terrorists is not grenades and submachine guns and bullets, but blackmail, and the best means of such blackmail is to turn a terrorist act into a public show," he said.

The hostage crisis began Oct. 23 when Chechen rebels seized a Moscow theater during the staging of a musical, taking hundreds of people captive. Three days later, Russian special forces stormed the building, killing the 41 militants.

At least 129 of the hostages also died, most of them felled by a narcotic gas used to knock out the rebels before the special forces stormed in.

During the siege, covered extensively by Russian media in frequent live reports, authorities briefly shut down a Moscow television station, accusing it of showing possible escape routes for the rebels. Officials also complained to a radio station after it broadcast a live interview with one of the hostage takers.

Shortly after the Chechen rebels took the theater, lawmakers passed the new legislation — a series of amendments to the country's existing media law — governing press coverage of "counter-terrorist operations."

Critics said the language in the amendments was too broad and could be used to shut down any news organization that irks authorities. They also complained that the restrictions could be used to further restrict coverage of the war in Chechnya, which Russian officials routinely refer to as a "counter-terrorist operation."

Last week, representatives of 30 of the country's major media organizations and the head of Putin's own human rights commission called on the president to veto the legislation. It was a rare show of unity among Moscow's press corps, bringing together Russia's two leading state-controlled television channels and their independent rivals, along with newspapers, radio stations and press freedom advocates.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me