ShareThis Page

Bush: U.S. in danger if Patriot Act expires

| Sunday, Dec. 18, 2005

WASHINGTON -- President Bush on Saturday escalated his attack on Senate Democrats and four Republicans for blocking efforts to renew the USA Patriot Act, but key lawmakers insisted they won't budge until stronger privacy protections are added to the domestic-surveillance law.

In a hard-hitting speech at the White House, the president rebuked those senators for blocking action Friday to reauthorize the Patriot Act's key provisions, which expire in two weeks.

"That decision is irresponsible, and it endangers the lives of our citizens," Bush said yesterday. "In the war on terror, we cannot afford to be without this law for a single moment."

On Friday, the president charged that the "delaying tactics" in the Senate could benefit terrorists who "want to attack America again and kill the innocent and inflict even greater damage than they did on September 11th."

Democrats hit back yesterday, saying Bush's aggressive use of domestic spying must be curbed by Congress and the courts to protect civil liberties.

"There is going to be no breakthrough" in the Senate impasse, said Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., adding that "the act as written is bad, and we need time to work it out."

U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the Judiciary Committee's top Democrat, said of Bush's speech: "Fear mongering and false choices do little to advance either the security or liberty of Americans."

The stalemate over the Patriot Act marks an increase in tensions between the administration and Congress over Bush's anti-terrorism and surveillance policies, as well as the conduct of the war in Iraq.

Although Democrats have led the criticisms, a number of Republican lawmakers have joined in, pressing for a troop-withdrawal timetable; a curb on interrogation techniques for detainees; and, now, stricter limits on the administration's powers to spy on U.S. residents.

Reid and Leahy want a three-month extension of the existing Patriot Act, which would give the House and Senate more time to negotiate changes that could be locked in for four years. Bush and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., repeatedly have said they won't accept a short-term extension.

Some Republican aides, though, said privately that with lawmakers eager to adjourn for the holidays, few viable options exist. If GOP leaders are pushed to the brink, a temporary extension of the current law might be preferable to its expiration.

U.S. Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., a leader of the filibuster, said yesterday: "Nobody wants these parts of the Patriot Act to expire. We want to fix them before making them permanent, by including important protections for the rights and freedoms of innocent American citizens."

On Friday, the Senate fell eight votes short of the 60 needed to end the filibuster and to allow a vote on the proposed renewal of the Patriot Act, which the House approved Wednesday. Four Republican senators joined all but two Democrats in voting to sustain the filibuster.

The Patriot Act, approved after the Sept. 11, 2-001, terrorist attacks, has made it easier for the FBI to conduct secret searches; monitor phone calls and e-mail; and obtain bank records and other personal documents in connection with terrorism investigations.

Critics say the proposed renewal would do too little to let targeted people mount a meaningful challenge to national-security letters and special subpoenas used by federal agents pursuing records.

The bill's supporters, including Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Philadelphia, say it strikes a reasonable balance between providing tools to fight terrorism and safeguarding civil liberties.

Greatly complicating the bid to renew the Patriot Act was an article Friday in The New York Times, disclosing that Bush had signed a secret order in 2002 authorizing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on citizens and foreign nationals in the United States.

Patriot Act provisions set to expire Dec. 31 include those permitting "roving wiretaps" of suspects; FBI access to their business and library records; and the pursuit of "lone wolf" suspects with no known ties to foreign powers or agents.

On Friday, Frist compared the bill's opponents to those who "have called for a retreat and defeat strategy in Iraq." He sounded more conciliatory yesterday, as he sought a way out of the impasse.

"Democrats want to fight this war on terror," Frist told reporters at the Capitol. "They want to give our law enforcement appropriate tools as well. I really feel that if we work hard, we can pass the Patriot Act (renewal) as written today, if I could just get people to study it and examine it."

Reid, though, told reporters yesterday that a temporary extension of the law, allowing renewed House-Senate negotiations next year, "is the only way to go." If the law "is not extended," he said, "the full blame is with the president and the Republicans. We have bent over backward to try to accommodate them."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me