ShareThis Page
U.S./World

Shiite militia to release American held for nine months

| Sunday, March 18, 2012

BAGHDAD -- Wearing an Army uniform and flanked by Iraqi lawmakers, an American citizen announced on Saturday that he was being released from more than nine months of imprisonment by a Shiite militia that for years targeted U.S. troops.

The man did not identify himself. But at a bizarre news conference outside the Green Zone in Baghdad, lawmakers showed U.S.-issued military and contractor ID cards that identified him as Randy Michael Hultz.

He spoke calmly but gave scant details of what he described as a "kidnapping," or how he was treated while captured.

"I was taken inside Baghdad and kept in and around different locations within the city," he said. The kidnappers, he said, were from the Promised Day Brigade, a branch of the Mahdi Army, which is a militia that is controlled by the anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Sadr's Mahdi Army fighters controlled swaths of Baghdad and southern Iraq until they were largely defeated by Iraqi and U.S. troops in 2008. Sadr disbanded most of the Mahdi Army and joined mainstream politics, but militias continued to battle U.S. forces.

Of his release, Hultz said: "It was explained to me that this is a gift to me, my family and to the American people."

He said he deployed to Iraq early in the war as an active-duty soldier but left the military after 15 months. At that point, he said, he worked in a "civilian capacity" until his kidnapping on June 18, 2011.

He did not wear patches on his uniform that would identify his rank or what unit he may have served with.

He was taken into the Green Zone and turned over to the United Nations mission after the news conference by Sadrist lawmakers Qusay al-Suhail, the deputy speaker of Iraq's parliament, and Maha al-Douri.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me