ShareThis Page
Home

Fire cause may have been electrical

| Monday, June 30, 2003

Although no official cause has been determined in the fire that destroyed the Morgan Management building, investigators are "leaning toward electrical," a fire official said Sunday.

Investigators are to return to the building today in an effort to determine what caused a raging fire Friday morning that destroyed the structure -- home to 21 professional offices, most of them doctors.

Butler Fire Department Capt. Bill Edmiston said Chief Larry Christy, building owner William Morgan and insurance investigators will spend the day sorting through the rubble.

Everyone in the building got out safely before flames destroyed the three-story structure, causing damage estimated to be millions of dollars.

As the investigation continues, Mayor Leonard Pintell said yesterday he has spoken with Gov. Ed Rendell's office about financial assistance to help Morgan rebuild or relocate in the city.

"I am trying to set up a meeting with Bill (Morgan) on Monday to get more information (to secure financial assistance)," Pintell said.

Pintell said about 90 percent of the doctors have been relocated to Butler Memorial Hospital. Also, Morgan has space in other buildings he owns, Pintell said.

The fire scene kept firefighters busy over the weekend as they were called to douse hot spots, Edmiston said.

"We've had calls off and on since Friday about smoke" throughout the burned-out building, Edmiston said.

Security guards were also placed outside the building "24 hours a day" because of the instability of the structure, Edmiston said.

"You need to keep people away," Edmiston said. "With too many people, it's curiosity killed the cat."

Edmiston said once officials determine the structure is safe, doctors will be permitted to go in and try to retrieve any of their records that might have survived the fire.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me