ShareThis Page
Home

Screaming fit leads to marijuana bust

| Thursday, June 10, 2004

Butler Township police investigating a complaint about a man screaming and yelling early Wednesday morning instead found a tongue-tied teenager who wouldn't even give up his name.

But his breath did the talking and led police to a marijuana growing room filled with 245 pot plants.

"The kid smelled like marijuana," officer Ray Kriebel said. "There was a strong, pungent odor around the whole area."

Kriebel and officer David Fish found Evan Young, 19, standing near a two-story shed behind a house along Bredin Avenue, and Kenneth Wayne Riddle, 32, later emerged from the structure, police said. A tray of fresh-cut marijuana was in plain view inside the first floor of the shed, according to police.

The officers secured a warrant at 4:44 a.m., entered the second story of the shed through a trap door and came into the growing room -- complete with fans, lights mounted on motors and a germination area.

Kriebel said the plants -- and another 25 young sprouts found in the woods behind the shed -- were in various stages of development, from seedlings to fully grown plants.

"He (Riddle) had a pretty extensive grow operation in there," the officer said.

Kriebel said police are not sure if either of the men was the person originally reported to be screaming and carrying on at about 1:30 a.m.

Kriebel said Riddle lives with his parents in the house on the property where the shed is located, and Young lives on Amherst Drive in the city of Butler.

Both men were arraigned before Butler Township District Justice Kevin O'Donnell on charges of manufacture of a controlled substance, criminal conspiracy, possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Young was being held in the Butler County Jail on Wednesday night in lieu of $50,000 bond. Riddle was freed after posting $50,000 bail.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me