ShareThis Page

Shaler man guilty of evasion

| Wednesday, March 17, 2010

A federal jury in Pittsburgh deliberated about two hours Tuesday before convicting a Shaler man of interfering with the assessment and collection of income taxes and failing to file three years' worth of returns.

Ronald Gardner Jr., 52, deliberately hid income from his business, Gardner Detective Agency, and assets such as his Somerset County home and his car in an attempt to keep the Internal Revenue Service from collecting taxes dating to 1992, prosecutors say.

Gardner declined comment after the verdict. His lawyer, Lowell H. Becraft of Huntsville, Ala., said any decision on an appeal would be made after U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti sentences Gardner.

Becraft told jurors that Gardner relied on government documents in coming to the conclusion that he wasn't subject to federal income taxes. Gardner believed federal jurisdiction was limited to the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories such as Guam and Puerto Rico, so it couldn't impose taxes on people in the 50 states, his attorney said.

Becraft said he wasn't surprised at how quickly the jury convicted Gardner of four felonies.

"You never can tell," he said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Luke Dembosky said there was little to say about the verdict except that it illustrates the importance of filing tax returns and paying taxes.

Dembosky told jurors the "mountain of evidence" in the case shows Gardner knew he was breaking the law. If he simply believed he didn't owe taxes, he wouldn't have stopped using his Social Security number, closed his bank account, put his business into one fraudulent trust and his home and car into another fraudulent trust, Dembosky said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me