ShareThis Page

Steering committee adds private representatives

| Thursday, April 25, 2002

Pine Township supervisors plan to add two private sector representatives to the township's Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee in an effort to provide a more diverse outlook on how the municipality should be developed in the coming decade.

Supervisors agreed Monday to add a business representative and a developer's representative to the committee after Richard Brant, chairman of the supervisors, suggested opening up membership to reflect more segments of the community.

The comprehensive plan, which municipalities across the state update about once every 10 years, is considered a road map for the community, indicating what facilities should be built or upgraded and what services are needed.

The committee now consists of Brant; Supervisor Raymond Hildreth; Victoria Raja and Frank J. Zappala III from the township planning commission; one member each from the township Environmental Advisory Council and Parks and Recreation Commission; and Scott D. Anderson, director of code administration and land development.

Although he agreed to expand the committee to nine members, Supervisor Dan Sporrer initially said he favored as many as 13 to tap additional interests.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me