ShareThis Page
Home

Newsmaker: Donna Stolz

| Monday, Oct. 10, 2011

Noteworthy : Stolz finished second and 19th in the Nikon Instruments 2011 Small World Photomicrography Competition. She submitted a picture of a blade of grass as seen with a confocal microscope illuminated by lasers to win second-place honors. Her 19th-place picture is a collage of different types of cells arranged to look like a wreath. For placing second out of nearly 2,000 entries from dozens of countries, Stolz receives $2,000 worth of Nikon equipment.

Age : 52

Residence : Shaler

Occupation : Associate director of the Center for Biologic Imaging at the University of Pittsburgh

Background : Stolz has been a member of the cell biology and physiology department at Pitt since 1997. She got a job there after she and her husband moved to the Pittsburgh area, so he could be an assistant professor at Duquesne University.

Education : Ph.D. in molecular and cell biology and a bachelor's degree in biochemistry, both from the University of Massachusetts -- Amherst.

Quote : "There's a lot of people in science who do art as well. It's good to have validity for something you think is really cool -- that other people find it cool as well."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me