ShareThis Page

Gas pipeline project dropped

| Wednesday, June 26, 2002

Keith Beacham heaved a sigh of relief this week after learning plans for construction of the $678 million Independence Pipeline had been dropped.

"This is good news," said Beacham, who lives outside of Portersville and is a vice president of the Ohio and Pennsylvania Landowners Association, which has been fighting the project.

The natural gas pipeline would have run through Butler and Lawrence counties, stretching from Defiance, Ohio, to Leidy, Clinton County. Insufficient market share killed the project, officials with the handful of companies involved in the project said.

Beacham said the landowners association was planning a series of picnics in Ohio and Pennsylvania to celebrate the good news.

Company officials, however, were not in a celebratory mood.

"The market for the project simply has not developed to the point where we can proceed with it," Joe Martucci, a spokesman for the companies, said Tuesday. "Basically, we're looking to abandon the project as it now stands."

Before construction could begin, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission required that 68 percent of the capacity of the pipeline be under contract, Martucci said.

"It looks to us like it's just not going to be possible to find that level of market support, which is necessary to go forth with the project," he said.

The pipeline was to be built and operated by Independence Pipeline Co., a general partnership formed by ANR Pipeline Co. in Detroit, Transcontinental Gas Line Corp. in Tulsa, Okla., and National Fuel Gas Co. in Buffalo, N.Y.

Independence officials submitted papers Monday with the regulatory commission requesting that the company's certificate to proceed with the project be vacated.

The commission, which issued the certificate allowing the project in July 2000, is expected to take formal action today.

Although Independence did acquire some easements, construction never began, Martucci said.

"We never got to the big-ticket items of purchasing pipe, purchasing compressors, letting contracts or that sort of thing," he said.

Beacham said he and others opposed to the project have insisted all along Independence never would get the required market support.

The pipeline was to have connected with other pipelines in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions, company officials said.

Independence officials said the pipeline would help "the capacity-constrained eastern United States" by providing natural gas from the Midwest.

But the Beachams and other opponents argued there was sufficient natural gas available in the East.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me