ShareThis Page

Father: 'I want justice'

| Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 10:51 a.m.

Two years later, Michael Hickenbottom Sr. still wants justice.

Hickenbottom said he learned from the media that U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan decided this month not to pursue charges against the two state police officers involved in the Dec. 24, 2002, shooting death of his 12-year-old son, Michael Ellerbe.

Joined by about 30 supporters on a frigid Friday afternoon, Hickenbottom and demonstrators from People Against Police Violence held a vigil outside the Fayette County Courthouse in Uniontown.

"I want justice," Hickenbottom said outside the building, which was closed for the holiday. "That's why we're in front of the courthouse. We want justice. That's all."

Michael was shot in the back at 2:30 p.m. on Christmas Eve 2002 as he ran through a Uniontown alley after fleeing from a vehicle that was reported stolen. Troopers Samuel Nassan and Juan Curry had said Michael ignored their commands to stop and take his hands out of his pockets.

Curry told a Fayette County coroner's jury that his gun accidentally discharged as he climbed a fence and fell. Hearing the shot and seeing Curry fall, Nassan testified that he believed Michael had shot his partner. Nassan then shot the boy, according to testimony.

Michael was unarmed.

No charges were recommended by the coroner's jury at the January 2003 inquest, and Fayette County District Attorney Nancy Vernon did not charge either officer. Buchanan announced on Dec. 13 that no federal charges would be filed, either.

A civil lawsuit against Curry and Nassan is pending in U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania. No trial date has been set.

"There's not enough money to bring Michael back," said Renee Wilson, director of the Pittsburgh chapter of People Against Police Violence. "We want to make sure this never happens again."

PAPV, which organized the vigil, works with families "to advocate for justice for the victims of police violence" and "demand that guilty cops serve maximum prison sentences," according to its Web site.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me