ShareThis Page
News

Three suspects identified in Fayette shooting

| Monday, March 23, 2009

Three Fayette County men have been charged with attempted homicide in connection with the shooting of a Republic man, including a 17-year-old boy who is charged as an adult.

A Republic teen and Stephan Lamar Fitzgerald, 19, of 472 Route 51 Road, Smock, were arraigned on the charges over the weekend.

An arrest warrant has been issued for a third man, Darroll Dewitt Gregg, 18, also known as "Baby D," of Uniontown.

In criminal complaints, state police at Belle Vernon said the three men went to Edward Charles Harper's residence in Redstone Township on Wednesday with intentions of robbing Harper of marijuana and $13,000 cash.

When Harper opened the door, an altercation ensued and Harper was shot as he tried to lock the door, according to the criminal complaints.

Harper, 29, suffered gunshot wounds to the head and torso, police said. He was flown by medicial helicopter to UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh. A hospital spokeswoman this morning said UPMC does not release patient-condition information on individuals who are crime victims.

In addition to attempted homicide, the three suspects are charged with reckless endangerment of another person because Harper's two young children were in the house at the time of the shooting. Police said the two boys, ages 12 and 9, were in a bed in their bedroom when the shots were fired into the house.

Police said Harper identified the Republic teen as one of his assailants while he was being treated at the scene and during a subsequent interview with them at the hospital on Friday. The youth was charged as an adult upon the recommendation of District Attorney Nancy Vernon, according to the affidavit.

Mackey was placed in the Fayette County Jail in lieu of $250,000 bond. Fitzgerald was arraigned Saturday and placed in the county jail in lieu of $250,000 bond.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me